3G Heli Prep ← 3GHeliPrep.com
← Instrument lesson plans
IH.II.A both lesson 45–60 minutes

Aircraft Systems Related to Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) Operations

Preflight Procedures · Task Task A. Aircraft Systems Related to Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) Operations

Completion Standards

Student demonstrates knowledge of all IH.II.A items to ACS standards without reference to materials. Risk management items correctly identified. All skill elements performed to ACS tolerances.

Objective

The student will develop comprehensive knowledge and demonstrate proficiency in helicopter systems essential for safe IFR operations, including anti-icing/deicing systems, flight control systems, and automated flight control systems (where applicable). Upon completion, the student will accurately explain operational characteristics and limitations of IFR-related aircraft systems, assess icing-related risks, and demonstrate familiarity with manufacturer-published procedures for the specific helicopter used in training, meeting the standards of FAA-S-ACS-14 IH.II.A.

Measurable Outcomes:

Content

Introduction

Single-pilot IFR helicopter operations demand intimate familiarity with aircraft systems because unlike many airplanes, most training helicopters lack redundant systems, autopilots, or sophisticated anti-icing equipment. The pilot must manage higher workload while understanding system limitations that directly affect safety in instrument meteorological conditions. This lesson addresses ACS Area of Operation II, Task A, covering the critical systems knowledge required before attempting actual or simulated instrument flight.

IH.II.A.K1: Anti-Icing and Deicing Systems

Understanding the Helicopter Icing Environment

Helicopters are particularly susceptible to airframe icing due to thin rotor blade profiles, exposed control linkages, and low-speed operations often conducted in icing layers during approaches. Unlike fixed-wing aircraft, helicopters cannot typically climb above icing or accelerate out of conditions quickly. The consequences are severe: blade icing creates asymmetric lift, vibration, rotor imbalance, and rapid performance degradation.

Regulatory Framework:

Airframe Anti-Icing/Deicing Systems:

  1. Rotor Blade Systems (if equipped):

    • Electrothermal systems: Heating elements embedded in blade leading edges (e.g., Sikorsky S-76, some S-70 variants)
    • Pneumatic boots: Rarely used in helicopters due to weight and maintenance complexity
    • Anti-ice fluids: Some helicopters use weeping systems distributing glycol-based fluid along blade leading edges
    • Limitations: Most systems are anti-ice (prevent formation) rather than deice (remove accumulation). They require activation BEFORE entering icing conditions. High electrical load may limit other system use simultaneously.

  2. Windshield Anti-Ice:

    • Electrical heating elements: Thin wires embedded in windshield panels
    • Hot air bleed systems: In turbine helicopters, bleed air from compressor section directed across windshield
    • Anti-ice fluids: Manual or automatic spray systems
    • Limitations: Windshield heating systems typically cannot remove heavy ice accumulation once formed. Most effective as anti-ice only. Avoid sudden temperature changes to prevent thermal stress cracking.

  3. Engine Inlet Anti-Ice:

    • Bleed air systems: Hot compressor bleed air directed to inlet lip (turbine helicopters)
    • Electrical heating: Less common, used in some smaller turbine installations
    • Purpose: Prevents ice ingestion causing compressor blade damage, FOD, or flameout
    • Limitations: Bleed air use reduces available power (typically 5-15%). May be prohibited above certain OAT or below certain power settings per POH.

  4. Pitot-Static System Protection:

    • Pitot heat: Electrical heating element inside pitot tube (required for IFR operations per 14 CFR §91.205(d)(8))
    • Static port heating: Rare in helicopters; most rely on flush-mounted ports less susceptible to icing
    • Alternate static source: Required consideration; know location and effects on instrument indications
    • Limitations: Pitot heat typically draws 5-10 amps. Failure results in frozen airspeed indication. Always verify pitot heat operation during preflight when flight in visible moisture is anticipated.

  5. Fuel System Considerations:

    • Fuel heaters: Some turbine helicopters have fuel heaters to prevent ice crystal formation in fuel (particularly Jet-A at high altitude)
    • Anti-icing additives: Diethylene glycol monomethyl ether (DiEGME) or isopropyl alcohol-based additives per manufacturer approval
    • Water separator drains: Critical preflight item; water in fuel system freezes, blocking fuel flow
    • Limitations: Additives must be approved for specific helicopter model. Over-treatment can damage seals and gaskets. Fuel heaters are automatic but failure may not be immediately evident.

Most Training Helicopter Reality:

Robinson R22/R44, Schweizer 300C, Enstrom 280FX, and similar training helicopters typically have:

This means pilots must understand ice recognition, avoidance, and escape procedures more than system operation.

Ice Detection and Recognition

Since most training helicopters lack ice detection systems, pilots rely on:

IH.II.A.K2: Flight Control Systems

Helicopter Flight Control Characteristics for IFR

Understanding flight control systems is critical for single-pilot IFR because instrument flight demands precise control with minimal visual reference. Helicopter flight controls differ fundamentally from fixed-wing aircraft.

Primary Flight Controls:

  1. Cyclic Control System:

    • Function: Tilts main rotor disc to control pitch and roll attitude
    • Components: Pilot’s cyclic stick → mixing unit/swashplate → pitch links → rotor blade pitch change
    • IFR Relevance: Most sensitive control; small inputs required during instrument flight. Turbulence or pilot tension causes overcontrol. In IMC, pilots tend to over-correct because lack of visual reference amplifies perceived movement.
    • System characteristics:
      • Friction adjustments must be properly set (too loose = unstable; too tight = pilot fatigue)
      • Control travels typically 4-6 inches in any direction
      • Force gradient should be consistent throughout travel
      • No “trim” system in most light helicopters

  2. Collective Control System:

    • Function: Changes main rotor blade pitch equally and simultaneously, controlling vertical thrust and manifold pressure/engine RPM
    • Components: Pilot’s collective lever → mixing unit → pitch links → rotor blade pitch change
    • IFR Relevance: Collective changes require simultaneous pedal adjustment to maintain heading. In IMC during approach descent, pilots often forget this relationship, causing heading deviations.
    • Throttle correlation: Most helicopters have throttle governor (turbine) or correlator (piston) automatically adjusting RPM with collective changes
    • System characteristics:
      • Governor systems: Beep trim buttons allow RPM adjustment (typically ±3% range)
      • Failure recognition: RPM fluctuation, inability to maintain RPM in turns or altitude changes
      • No collective “trim” in most training helicopters; pilot maintains constant pressure

  3. Anti-Torque Pedals (Tail Rotor Control):

    • Function: Changes tail rotor blade pitch to control yaw and counteract main rotor torque
    • Components: Pilot pedals → push-pull tubes or cables → tail rotor pitch change mechanism
    • IFR Relevance: Requires constant adjustment with power changes. In IMC, pilots fixate on heading indicator and “chase” it with pedals instead of using smooth, predictive inputs.
    • System characteristics:
      • Pedal effectiveness varies with airspeed (more effective with higher tail rotor RPM/airflow)
      • Right pedal required with power increase (most helicopters with counter-clockwise rotor rotation)
      • Tail rotor authority limits: Loss of tail rotor effectiveness (LTE) can occur in low-speed right turns with high power settings

Flight Control System Limitations Affecting IFR:

Control Augmentation Systems (if equipped):

Some advanced training helicopters (e.g., Robinson R66, Bell 505) include:

Control System Inspections for IFR

Before IFR flight, verify:

  1. Full and free control movement in all axes (no binding, unusual friction)
  2. Cyclic friction adjustment set per pilot preference (light enough for smooth inputs, firm enough to prevent overcontrol)
  3. Governor/correlator operates smoothly through collective range
  4. No unusual vibrations, noises, or control position/helicopter response mismatches
  5. SAS/stability augmentation operational if equipped (per POH checklist)

IH.II.A.R1: Operations in Icing Conditions

Risk Assessment:

Helicopter operations in icing conditions present extreme risk because:

  1. Rapid ice accumulation: Thin rotor blades accumulate ice quickly
  2. Asymmetric icing: Individual blades may ice differently, causing vibration and control difficulty
  3. Limited climb performance: Cannot quickly climb above icing layer
  4. No deice capability: Most training helicopters cannot remove ice once formed
  5. Degraded handling: Iced rotors exhibit increased vibration, reduced RPM, control coupling, and uncommanded flight control inputs

Icing Recognition in Flight:

Decision-Making for Icing Encounters:

If ice accumulation observed:

  1. Immediate action: Exit icing conditions using safest available route (climb, descend, turn—depending on pilot reports and forecasts)
  2. Declare emergency if needed: ATC can provide priority handling and vectors to VMC
  3. Do NOT delay: Ice accumulation accelerates. Waiting worsens the situation.
  4. Land as soon as practical: Even after exiting icing, accumulated ice may shed asymmetrically during approach, causing control difficulties

Regulatory Compliance:

Risk Mitigation:

IH.II.A.R2: Limitations of Anti-Icing and Deicing Systems

Even helicopters equipped with anti-ice systems have significant limitations:

System Capability Limitations:

  1. Anti-ice vs. Deice: Most helicopter systems are anti-ice only. They cannot remove ice once accumulated. Pilot must activate BEFORE entering icing.
  2. Coverage Limitations: Systems typically protect only leading edges of rotor blades, windshield, and engine inlet. Tail rotor, antennas, skids, and other surfaces remain unprotected.
  3. Severity Limitations: Systems are certificated for specific icing conditions (typically light to moderate rime or mixed icing). They may be inadequate in freezing rain or severe icing.
  4. Duration Limitations: Some systems (especially fluid-based) have limited capacity. Prolonged exposure exhausts anti-ice fluid reserves.
  5. Power Limitations: Operating anti-ice systems reduces available power. Engine inlet bleed air reduces power 5-15%. This may prevent maintaining altitude or executing missed approach.

Operational Limitations:

POH/RFM Limitations:

Every helicopter with anti-ice equipment has specific POH/RFM limitations:

Risk Management Strategy:

IH.II.A.R3: Use of Automated Systems in Instrument Conditions

Most training helicopters have minimal automation, but understanding limitations is critical:

Autopilot/AFCS Limitations (if equipped):

  1. Capability Limits:

    • Basic helicopter autopilots typically provide attitude hold, altitude hold, and heading hold only
    • Most do NOT provide coupled approaches or auto-hover in IMC
    • Limited authority: Autopilot can be overridden by pilot control inputs or turbulence

  2. Pilot Workload:

    • Autopilot/AFCS can reduce pilot workload during cruise, allowing focus on navigation, communication, systems management
    • However, autopilot programming, mode selection, and monitoring ADD workload at critical phases (approach setup, missed approach initiation)

  3. Mode Awareness:

    • Pilot must maintain constant awareness of which autopilot mode is active
    • Mode confusion leads to loss of aircraft control (e.g., pilot thinks altitude hold is active but it’s not; aircraft descends unnoticed)

  4. Turbulence Limitations:

    • Most helicopter autopilots disengage or perform poorly in moderate or greater turbulence
    • Autopilot cycling on/off repeatedly during turbulent IMC increases pilot workload rather than reducing it

Failure Recognition:

Autopilot/AFCS failures manifest as:

Immediate Actions for Autopilot Failure:

  1. Disconnect autopilot (paddle switch or master disconnect)
  2. Hand-fly aircraft using basic attitude instrument scan
  3. Notify ATC if unable to maintain assigned altitude/heading
  4. Do not attempt to troubleshoot in IMC—focus on flying

Governor/Correlator Systems:

These are automated systems requiring understanding:

Risk Mitigation:

Training Helicopter-Specific Considerations

Robinson R22/R44:

Schweizer 300C:

Enstrom 280FX:

Bell 206 (if used for training):

References

Schedule

TimeActivityDescription
0:00-0:05IntroductionLesson objectives, ACS standards review, helicopter systems overview context
0:05-0:25Anti-Icing/Deicing SystemsIH.II.A.K1: Rotor, airframe, windshield, engine inlet, pitot-static, fuel systems; training helicopter limitations
0:25-0:45Flight Control SystemsIH.II.A.K2: Cyclic, collective, pedals; characteristics for IFR; control augmentation systems if applicable
0:45-1:00Icing Risk ManagementIH.II.A.R1 and R2: Icing operations risks, recognition, decision-making, system limitations
1:00-1:15Automated Systems RisksIH.II.A.R3: Autopilot/AFCS limitations, mode awareness, governor/correlator considerations
1:15-1:30POH/RFM ReviewIH.II.A.S1 and S2: Student demonstrates familiarity with manufacturer procedures for training helicopter
1:30-1:45Practical ApplicationScenario-based discussions: icing encounter, autopilot failure, governor failure in IMC
1:45-2:00Assessment & ReviewOral questioning, completion standards verification, lesson closure

Total Duration: 2.0 hours (ground instruction)

Equipment

Required References

Training Materials

Visual Aids

Student Materials

Instructor Actions

  1. Begin with the “Why This Matters” Hook: Open by stating, “More helicopter IFR accidents involve systems misunderstanding than pilot technique failures. Today we’re learning the systems that keep you alive in IMC—and more importantly, their limitations that define when you stay out of IMC entirely.” Reference recent NTSB accident (instructor should have current example prepared) involving icing or system failure in helicopter IFR operation.

  2. Present ACS Task Overview: Display FAA-S-ACS-14 IH.II.A and explain that this task is evaluated during the oral portion of the instrument helicopter practical test. Emphasize that examiner will expect detailed knowledge of the specific training helicopter’s systems, not generic answers.

  3. Introduce Anti-Icing/Deicing Systems (IH.II.A.K1): Begin with reality check: “Most of you are training in R22s, R44s, or Schweizer 300s. These helicopters have essentially ZERO ice protection beyond pitot heat. This lesson isn’t about how to fly in ice—it’s about why you can’t, and what to do if you encounter it accidentally.”

  4. Explain Rotor Blade Icing Dynamics: Use whiteboard to draw rotor blade cross-section. Show how ice accumulates on leading edge, distorting airfoil shape. Explain: “Ice changes the blade from a precision lifting surface to a flying brick. You get asymmetric icing—one blade ices more than others—creating vibration that can damage the rotor system or lead to control system failure.” Draw analogy: “Imagine driving a car where one tire is suddenly twice as heavy as the others. That’s what asymmetric rotor icing does.”

  5. Detail Pitot-Static System Protection: Point out pitot tube location on training helicopter (use photo or walk to helicopter if practical). Demonstrate pitot heat switch and explain: “Pitot heat is required by 14 CFR 91.205(d)(8) for IFR. You check it during runup by feeling the tube for warmth—but don’t burn yourself. If pitot heat fails in flight and the tube ices over, your airspeed indicator freezes. You’re now flying attitude and power settings with no airspeed reference.”

  6. Demonstrate POH/RFM Limitations Review (IH.II.A.S1): Open training helicopter POH/RFM to limitations section. Point to specific statement: “Flight into known icing conditions is prohibited.” Explain: “Known icing means you received a weather briefing that included AIRMET Zulu, PIREPs of icing, or forecast freezing rain. If you file IFR into conditions where icing is forecast, you’re violating this limitation—and 14 CFR 91.9 which requires compliance with operating limitations.”

  7. Show Weather Product Analysis: Display sample AIRMET Zulu for icing. Walk through interpretation: “AIRMET Zulu valid 1400-2000, occasional moderate rime/mixed icing in clouds and precipitation between 5,000 and 14,000 feet. Freezing level at 3,500 feet. This means if you file IFR and your route takes you above 3,500 feet in IMC, you’re potentially entering known icing conditions. As PIC, you must decline the clearance or file for a lower altitude remaining below the freezing level—assuming terrain allows.”

  8. Transition to Flight Control Systems (IH.II.A.K2): State: “Now let’s talk about the systems you use every second of IFR flight: your flight controls. Unlike airplanes where you can trim and let go for a few seconds, helicopters require constant control inputs. This is exhausting during extended IFR, which is why we emphasize scan efficiency and smooth control technique.”

  9. Explain Cyclic Control System Characteristics: Use diagram or gestures to show cyclic movement axis. Explain: “Cyclic is your most sensitive control. In VMC, you make large control movements using outside visual references. In IMC, you make tiny control movements—one or two inches max—using instrument references. New instrument students over-control because they react to every instrument indication rather than maintaining steady attitude. Think of cyclic pressure rather than cyclic movement.”

  10. Demonstrate Collective/Pedal Coordination Principle: State: “Every collective change requires a pedal input. Raise collective—right pedal. Lower collective—left pedal. This is automatic in VMC, but in IMC you’re cognitively loaded with scan and navigation. Students forget the pedal and chase the heading indicator with pedal inputs, creating a pilot-induced oscillation. The fix: Anticipate the pedal requirement before you move the collective.”

  11. Explain Governor/Correlator Operation: Point to throttle twist grip (or beep trim buttons on collective). Explain: “The governor automatically adjusts fuel flow to maintain RPM when you change collective. But it has limits—typically about 3% RPM range. If you raise collective too aggressively, RPM will droop. In IMC, you’re task-saturated and may not notice RPM decay until you get an audio warning. Always cross-check RPM in your instrument scan, especially during approaches when you’re descending with reduced power and then adding power for level-off.”

  12. Address Autopilot/AFCS Systems (IH.II.A.S2, if applicable): If training helicopter is equipped: Open POH/RFM to autopilot section and review modes (attitude hold, altitude hold, heading hold). Explain: “The autopilot is not a substitute for flying skills. It’s a workload management tool. You use it during low-workload phases—enroute cruise—to free up cognitive capacity for navigation and communication. You disconnect it during high-workload phases—approach and missed approach—because mode management adds workload rather than reducing it.” Demonstrate autopilot control panel, showing mode selection, disconnect paddle switch, and annunciator panel indications.

  13. Discuss Autopilot Mode Awareness: Present scenario: “You’re flying an ILS approach, hand-flying with autopilot off. At decision height, you execute missed approach. In the stress of the moment, you accidentally engage altitude hold mode, not realizing it. The autopilot captures current altitude. You’re climbing, but the autopilot fights you. You overcome it with forward cyclic pressure—but you’re now in a high-workload struggle with your own automation. The fix: Brief before every approach: ‘Autopilot will remain off for approach and missed approach. If I choose to engage it after established on the missed approach course, I will call it out loud: Autopilot engaged, heading hold mode.’”

  14. Explain Icing Risk Management (IH.II.A.R1): Present scenario: “You’re IFR at 6,000 feet in IMC. OAT is -5°C. You suddenly notice ice forming on the windshield edges and skid tubes. What are your immediate actions?” Pause for student response, then explain: “First, recognize this is an emergency. You have minutes before rotor icing causes vibration and control problems. Second, exit icing conditions immediately—request higher or lower altitude, turn toward nearest VFR, declare emergency if needed. Third, do NOT delay hoping it gets better. Ice accumulation accelerates. Fourth, land as soon as practical—even if ice stops accumulating, it may shed asymmetrically during approach, causing control issues.”

  15. Detail Anti-Ice/Deice System Limitations (IH.II.A.R2): State: “Even helicopters with anti-ice systems have limitations. These systems prevent ice formation, but they can’t remove heavy accumulation. They’re certificated for light to moderate icing only. Severe icing or freezing rain exceeds system capability. Also, operating anti-ice systems reduces engine power 5-15% because of bleed air usage. This means you might not be able to maintain altitude or execute a missed approach if already at high power settings.”

  16. Address Automated Systems Risks (IH.II.A.R3): Explain: “Automation in IMC is a double-edged sword. It reduces workload when everything works, but it increases workload dramatically when it fails. Murphy’s Law applies: Automation will fail at the worst possible moment—during an approach in IMC. Your job is to stay proficient at hand-flying so that when the autopilot disconnects unexpectedly, you smoothly take over without altitude or heading deviations. We practice autopilot-off approaches regularly for exactly this reason.”

  17. Conduct POH/RFM Practical Exercise: Hand student the training helicopter POH/RFM and ask: “Show me where the anti-ice/deicing procedures are published. Now show me the limitations. Now show me what the POH says about governor system operation and limits. Now show me the autopilot operating procedures if equipped.” Observe student’s ability to locate information quickly. Provide coaching on POH/RFM organization and effective information retrieval techniques.

  18. Present Realistic IFR Scenario #1: “You’re cleared for the ILS Runway 36 approach. During descent through 4,000 feet, the governor fails. The low RPM audio warning sounds. You now must manually control throttle while hand-flying the approach in IMC. What are your immediate actions, and how do you manage workload?” Guide student through decision process: Notify ATC, slow down to reduce workload, consider diverting to VMC airport if available, execute simpler approach type if able (GPS vs. ILS reduces workload), brief emergency procedures for balked landing with manual throttle.

  19. Present Realistic IFR Scenario #2: “You filed IFR at 6,000 feet. Weather briefing mentioned AIRMET Zulu for moderate icing above 5,000 feet. ATC issues your clearance: ‘Cleared to XYZ airport via radar vectors, climb and maintain 7,000 feet.’ Do you accept this clearance?” Correct answer: No. Explain: “This clearance takes you into known icing conditions, violating your helicopter’s limitations. You respond: ‘Unable 7,000 feet due to icing forecast. Request 4,000 feet or cancel IFR.’ ATC will accommodate or suggest alternatives.”

  20. Administer Oral Assessment Questions: Ask student to explain:

    • “What specific anti-ice or deicing systems are installed on our training helicopter, and what are their operational procedures?” (Student must reference POH/RFM and accurately describe systems or state that none are installed beyond pitot heat)
    • “Explain how rotor blade icing affects helicopter controllability and performance.” (Student must describe asymmetric icing, vibration, performance degradation)
    • “What are the decision criteria for entering icing conditions in a helicopter equipped with anti-ice systems?” (Student must explain light-to-moderate icing certification, system limitations, requirement to exit if conditions exceed system capability)
    • “Describe the flight control system characteristics that make instrument flight in helicopters more demanding than fixed-wing aircraft.” (Student must explain lack of trim, interconnected controls, constant manual inputs required)
    • “If the autopilot fails during an instrument approach, what are your immediate actions?” (Disconnect autopilot, hand-fly using attitude instrument scan, notify ATC if unable to maintain altitude/heading, continue approach or execute missed approach as appropriate)

  21. Review ACS Completion Standards: State: “The ACS requires you to demonstrate familiarity with anti-icing/deicing procedures and AFCS procedures specific to the helicopter used on the practical test. ‘Familiarity’ means you can locate the information in the POH/RFM quickly, explain the procedures accurately, and describe limitations completely. The examiner will not accept generic answers—you must reference your specific helicopter model.”

  22. Provide Lesson Summary: Recap key points: “Today we covered IH.II.A systems related to IFR operations. You learned that most training helicopters have minimal ice protection, making icing avoidance essential. You understand flight control system characteristics that increase workload during single-pilot IFR. You know how to assess risks associated with icing, system limitations, and automation use. Most importantly, you can locate and interpret manufacturer procedures in the POH/RFM for your specific helicopter.”

  23. Assign Post-Lesson Review: Instruct student: “Before our next lesson, review your helicopter’s POH/RFM cover-to-cover, focusing on systems, limitations, and emergency procedures sections. Create a one-page quick reference card with emergency actions for: icing encounter, governor failure, and autopilot failure if equipped. We’ll review this during preflight for your next IFR flight lesson.”

Student Actions

  1. Actively Engage in Lesson Introduction: Listen attentively to accident case study and lesson objectives. Ask clarifying questions about ACS requirements and evaluation criteria.

  2. Take Detailed Notes: Record key information about anti-icing/deicing systems, flight control characteristics, and risk management procedures. Use headings matching ACS knowledge and risk management codes (IH.II.A.K1, K2, R1, R2, R3) for organized notes.

  3. Participate in Systems Discussion: Answer instructor’s questions about systems operation, limitations, and procedures. Offer examples from previous flight experience when applicable.

  4. Review POH/RFM Sections: When instructor presents POH/RFM, follow along with personal copy. Highlight or bookmark key sections (limitations, emergency procedures, systems descriptions) for quick reference.

  5. Analyze Weather Products: Study sample AIRMET Zulu and practice interpreting icing forecasts. Identify conditions that would prohibit IFR flight in training helicopter (freezing level, icing intensity, affected altitudes).

  6. Examine Diagrams and Photos: Study visual aids showing ice accumulation effects, flight control schematics, and autopilot control panels. Ask questions to clarify understanding of system operation.

  7. Locate POH/RFM Information: When instructor requests, quickly find anti-ice/deicing procedures, limitations, governor operating procedures, and autopilot procedures (if equipped) in POH/RFM. Demonstrate ability to use table of contents and index effectively.

  8. Work Through Scenarios: Actively problem-solve realistic IFR scenarios presented by instructor. Verbalize decision-making process: “I would do X because Y, considering Z limitation.” Practice risk assessment and mitigation strategies.

  9. Answer Assessment Questions: Respond to instructor’s oral questions completely and accurately. If uncertain, state so rather than guessing—then ask for explanation. Reference POH/RFM when answering system-specific questions.

  10. Demonstrate Familiarity Standards: Show ability to locate manufacturer procedures quickly in POH/RFM. Explain procedures accurately using correct terminology. Describe limitations completely without omissions.

  11. Ask Clarifying Questions: Seek clarification on any concept not fully understood. Examples: “How do I know if ice accumulation exceeds light-to-moderate classification?” or “What specific autopilot indications suggest mode confusion versus system failure?”

  12. Self-Assess Against ACS: Compare personal knowledge against IH.II.A standards. Identify areas needing additional study or practice.

  13. Complete Post-Lesson Assignment: Review POH/RFM thoroughly after lesson. Create quick reference card for emergency procedures. Prepare questions for next lesson based on POH/RFM review.

Completion Standards

The lesson is complete when the student demonstrates mastery of ACS standards for IH.II.A by meeting the following measurable criteria:

Knowledge Requirements (IH.II.A.K1, K2)

Anti-Icing and Deicing Systems (IH.II.A.K1):

Flight Control Systems (IH.II.A.K2):

Risk Management Requirements (IH.II.A.R1, R2, R3)

Operations in Icing Conditions (IH.II.A.R1):

Limitations of Anti-Ice/Deice Systems (IH.II.A.R2):

Use of Automated Systems in Instrument Conditions (IH.II.A.R3):

Skill Requirements (IH.II.A.S1, S2)

Demonstrate Familiarity with Anti-Ice/Deice Procedures (IH.II.A.S1):

Demonstrate Familiarity with AFCS Procedures (IH.II.A.S2, if applicable):

Overall Performance Standard

Student meets ACS IH.II.A completion standards when they can:

Instructor evaluates understanding through:

Unsatisfactory performance indicators requiring remediation:

Student demonstrating unsatisfactory performance receives additional ground instruction focusing on weak areas, followed by re-assessment before progressing to flight lessons involving actual or simulated instrument conditions.

Want the complete lesson plan library as a downloadable Word document?

Download the Free CFI Lesson Plan Binder